Why Does Kb4093118 for Windows 7 Keep Installing Over and Over Again?
Annemarie, I hope I volition non add together new confusion. I read yous equally needing an caption, if wrong I apologise. The metainformation discussed is non important data that is needed on your machine. It is the with/amongst/after-data that is part of the delivery mechanism.
I'll go metaphor here and run with the delivery idea. There is a bakery supplier that makes daily deliveries to your local grocer. The breads, cakes, and assorted goodies inside the truck are the patches and other important information delivered to your operating organization. The truck itself, the markings on the exterior, and the turn signals/brakelights are the metadata that come up with the data.
Originally, KB4093118 drove in with a blown taillight, causing other traffic problems on its way to the grocer. KB4093118 later went out with a repaired taillight that relieved the traffic conditions. Simply the breadstuff, cakes and goodies are all the same every bit they were earlier.
If you accept KB4093118 installed, and practice not accept whatsoever current problems, you lot should be fine. Ideally all the delivery trucks Microsoft sends out will exist in acme running order. We have observed that is not the case, so cannot say with certainty yet that KB4103718 is expert or bad. That is the fundamental idea of the MSDefcon organization.
Are you lot currently experiencing some fault or mistake status that suggests a troubled installation? Or are y'all checking to verify you are skillful, even while your arrangement is performing within normal ranges of reliability?
@Cascadian. The metafor does make information technology easier to sympathise. One role I still do non understand completely. The broken taillight van delivered its update and drove home. After that, perhaps days after that, people installed the April preview and had the keep-on-giving problem, fifty-fifty when the brokentaillightvan was gone. Or must it exist seen as this: the brokentaillightvan still remained on the very outstretched WU-means. When MS fixed the taillight, that fixing happened on the highway (and not on private pc's), and from that moment on information technology could not cause whatever other traffic problems anymore? And so fixed metadata does non require the average Jane like me to reinstall a patch?
At the moment my pc does non have issues (apart from the nightmarish hassle updating has turned into since the attempts to go along it W10-costless). I won't apply the May update until the Defconstatus changes.
thank you for your explanation and time, much appreciated!
~Annemarie
1 user thanked author for this post.
I'chiliad glad my illustration worked equally far equally information technology did, to highlight the separateness of what is of import to your installation. Across that, it might be misleading to take it too seriously.
I believe you lot kept within the spirit of the imagery though, with your follow up question.
… And then stock-still metadata does not require the average Jane like me to reinstall a patch?
At the moment my pc does non have bug (autonomously from the nightmarish hassle updating has turned into since the attempts to keep it W10-gratuitous). I won't apply the May update until the Defconstatus changes.
thank you for your caption and fourth dimension, much appreciated!
~Annemarie
In this case and with what you have described, Aye, I hold that you exercise not need to reinstall. I agree with your assessment, and plan going frontward. Let Microsoft make its few mistakes, and allow the MSDefcon method to go along those mistakes at a altitude, until they are better described and a plan is fabricated to bargain with them.
There are cases where uncorrected metadata altered the installation of a different patch. To extend the metaphor, when the baker truck did non indicate a plough, the dairy truck was cutting off and hit a lamppost, and did non complete delivery that day. You do non mutter of missing whatever cream for your java or milk for your cereal. Meaning y'all do not describe whatever errors or problem in normal use. The 'bad' metadata has not acquired a trouble.
If there is lingering doubt in anyone's mind. It is also acceptable to perform the un/re-install process without need. The hazard there is unpredictable things might happen whenever you fix something that was not broken. At best it is time spent on a minor issue, that was not causing a trouble or throwing an error. And so it is not given as advice to follow.
Glad that it helped.
Source: https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving-win7-monthly-rollup-kb-4093118-installs-over-and-over/
0 Response to "Why Does Kb4093118 for Windows 7 Keep Installing Over and Over Again?"
Post a Comment